The following Technical Papers are available for download: -
1. Pipeline Flooding, Dewatering and Venting - Aidan O'Donoghue,
PPSA Conference London, December 2004
Flooding, cleaning, gauging, dewatering and venting of offshore oil and gas pipelines during pre-commissioning
involves pipeline pigging and expensive deployment vessel time. To aid in the planning of such operations, a number of
analyses can be undertaken to determine the duration to perform each of these tasks. The mathematical models can also
optimise the equipment required (hoses, pumps, compressors). Problems that could be encountered without a clear
knowledge of how the operation will proceed can be avoided. The operation can be monitored by comparing recorded
and predicted values, for example inlet pressure. This paper provides an overview of work performed to establish
pig velocity, inlet pressure and pigging duration during various pre-commissioning tasks.
2. Pigging as a Flow Assurance Solution –
Estimating Pigging Frequency for
Dewaxing - Aidan O'Donoghue, Pipeline Pigging Conference, Amsterdam, May 2004
Pigging is used widely
for removal of wax build-up on the internal wall of a
pipeline. Much information is available on the prediction of wax deposition levels
in such lines and pigs play an important role in the removal of this expected wax
accumulation. Although these tools are generally much cheaper than chemicals
for wax inhibition or suppression, there is very little guidance available for the
selection of the correct pig, the sizing of bypass ports and the pigging frequency.
Incorrect selection can be dangerous since a significant build-up of wax ahead of
the pig can plug the pipeline. This can lead to extended downtime and an
expensive pipeline repair. For subsea launching, extending the time between
pigging is advantageous since this means that fewer interventions are required to
load the subsea launcher. Correct selection of the pigging frequency is therefore
very important. This paper aims to provide direction on this subject, using the
output from wax prediction models and expected daily wax build-up in the
pipeline. The method outline can be used to determine a pigging strategy for
pipeline start-ups; pigging at low flow; cleaning normally unpigged lines;
progressive cleaning of problem lines and regular pigging of lines with full
information on wax deposition or merely an indication of wax percentage in the
flow.
3. Why Pigs get Stuck, and how to avoid it - Aidan
O'Donoghue, Pipeline Pigging Conference, Amsterdam, October 2002
Operators and contractors have been running pigs successfully for years. Every so often, a
problem occurs and one becomes stuck, stalled or damaged in the pipeline. As the need for
innovative one-off pigs for specialist applications arises, the risk of this occurring increases.
Sufficient planning and analysis should be performed to allow the pigs to run successfully and
perform their duty in the line effectively. This includes stringent testing, CAD work and
analysis. This paper looks at the main reasons for pigs sticking and stalling in lines and
examines what can be done about it. The paper looks at several different categories of
failures, identifies the root cause of the problem and looks at how these scenarios might best
be avoided. The figures at the back of the paper may be used as guidelines for consideration
and avoidance of the problems discussed.
4. Latest Design Techniques for Dual and
Multidiameter pigs - Aidan O'Donoghue, Pipeline Pigging Conference, Houston, January
2001
The aim of this work is to show how design and simulation techniques can provide a greater
insight into the nature of pig motion and how pigs behave in pipelines. A number of such
methods used to investigate and improve the reliability and efficiency of dual and multidiameter
pipeline pigs are described. A case study is presented based on actual field examples. The
problem of pig selection for a dual diameter application is investigated followed by an
analysis of pig efficiency during a dewatering operation. The transient motion of the pig,
because of the sudden change in friction when negotiating the reducer, is presented using the
Piglab model. Conceptual and detailed design and simulation of pig performance can allow pigs
to be built that will perform more satisfactorily in the line, help reduce fear of stalling,
and lead to innovative design solutions.
5. Dynamic Simulation of the Norne Heidrun 10" x
16" Dewatering Pig - Aidan O'Donoghue, Pipes and Pipeline International, January/February
2001
The 10" x 16" Norne Heidrun pipeline presents a considerable challenge in terms of pig
development for both pre-commissioning and operations. The RFO (Ready for Operation)
Department at Statoil in Stavanger has developed the pre-commissioning concept which employs
five 10" x 16" Dual Diameter pigs, Figure 1, for pipeline dewatering. The Åsgard 42" x 28" Dual
Diameter pigs are the basis for this concept [1, 2]. These pigs employ a wheel suspension
system for centralisation in the large pipeline. Buckle Inducers are used for efficiently
folding the 16" seals into the 10" line. Correct selection of seal geometry and properties
allows the seals to buckle when required and recover sufficiently from compression set. The
dewatering pig train consists of four pigs run with a glycol batch between each and a trailing
final pig run in dry air or nitrogen. As the final pig exits the 10" flexible and enters the 16"
line, a potential problem arises. Due to the sudden drop in friction, the pig will accelerate
suddenly to a relatively high velocity. Such acceleration can cause the pig to compress the
gas in front of it, decelerate and finally reverse. Therefore, the final pig could potentially
reverse into the 16" Y-piece thus damaging either the Y or the pig. This scenario must be
avoided.
To investigate this problem, the dewatering operation was modelled using Piglab, a pig motion
model from Pipeline Research Limited and the pig train designed to avoid this problem.
6. Multi diameter pigging for Åsgard, Commissioning and pigging the
710km 42" x 28" Åsgard Pipeline - Christian Falck, Aidan O'Donoghue, OPT Conference, Oslo, 2000
Statoil has designed and tested dual diameter pipeline pigs to
perform various tasks during operations, precommissioning and
commissioning of the 710km 42"x28" Åsgard pipeline. The concepts
developed have been put through a major design and testing
program to demonstrate that the various functional requirements
have been met. The paper describes the development process as
well as field experience from the initial pigging runs of the Åsgard
Pipeline.
Home
|
About Us
|
Software
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Case Studies
|
Concepts
|
Feedback
|
Links
|